CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB
Measured performance for CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB across 1 verified WhatFPS runs. Every number is measured in our benchmark suite — not estimated, not self-reported. Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS): 8,135 on average over the best run per rig, best run 8,135 — #65 of 110 measured system drives. Most often paired with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor.
CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB — subtests
- Sequential read (1 MB blocks): 2,508 MB/s
- 4K IOPS: 9,261
- 4K latency, median: 103 µs — lower is better
- 4K latency, p99: 222 µs
Specifications
- Manufacturer: unknown — shown as reported
- Type: NVMe SSD
- Size: 256 GB
- Model string (seen): CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB
What the numbers mean
The GAMING score is a geometric mean of GPU (63 %), CPU (30 %), RAM (5 %) and drive (2 %) — a weak part cannot hide behind a strong one. The drive score is a geometric mean of sequential read (1 MB blocks) and random 4K read (IOPS), measured unbuffered on a 256 MB temp file on the system drive. Only the system drive is measured. The same model can differ between rigs: PCIe generation, fill level and driver all matter. Every run is HMAC-signed in the app and scored on the server. The full methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
Compare CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB with other hardware
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 2 TB — 19,162 Drive score
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 1 TB — 18,621 Drive score
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB — 17,026 Drive score
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Lexar NM990 4 TB — 15,889 Drive score
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Acer Predator GM7 4 TB — 15,709 Drive score
- CL4-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSSTC 256GB vs Samsung 980 PRO 500 GB — 15,649 Drive score