CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB
Measured performance for CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB across 1 verified WhatFPS runs. Every number is measured in our benchmark suite — not estimated, not self-reported. Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS): 11,803 — measured in one rig so far, #40 of 133 measured system drives. Most often paired with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 w Radeon 890M.
The measurements below come from the same run as the headline score. View the run
CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB — subtests
- Sequential read (1 MB blocks): 3,016 MB/s
- 4K IOPS: 16,214
- 4K latency, median: 54 µs — lower is better
- 4K latency, p99: 183 µs
Specifications
- Manufacturer: unknown — shown as reported
- Type: NVMe SSD
- Size: 2 TB
- Model string (seen): CT2000P3PSSD8
What the numbers mean
The headline score is the part's best measured run, and the measurements under it come from that same run. It shows what the part has been proven to do — not what an average rig gets out of it. The GAMING score is a geometric mean of GPU (63 %), CPU (30 %), RAM (5 %) and drive (2 %) — a weak part cannot hide behind a strong one. The drive score is a geometric mean of sequential read (1 MB blocks) and random 4K read (IOPS), measured unbuffered on a 256 MB temp file on the system drive. Only the system drive is measured. The same model can differ between rigs: PCIe generation, fill level and driver all matter. Every run is HMAC-signed in the app and scored on the server. The full methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
Compare CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB with other hardware
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 2 TB — 19,442 Drive score
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 1 TB — 19,336 Drive score
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB — 17,026 Drive score
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs Lexar NM790 1 TB — 16,958 Drive score
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs WD Green SN3000 500 GB — 16,530 Drive score
- CT2000P3PSSD8 2 TB vs Samsung 990 PRO 1 TB — 16,069 Drive score