Core Ultra 9 285H vs Genuine 0000 @ 3.40GHz
Short answer: which is best?
Core Ultra 9 285H is 28.1 % stronger than Genuine 0000 @ 3.40GHz. Core Ultra 9 285H ranks #10 of 44 measured processors at WhatFPS (11,033 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Genuine 0000 @ 3.40GHz ranks #20 of 44 measured processors at WhatFPS (8,614 CPU score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Core Ultra 9 285H | Genuine 0000 @ 3.40GHz |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 11,033 | 8,614 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 3,354 | 6,223 |
| Integer (MT) | 6.3 Gop/s | 6.8 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.89 Gop/s | 0.59 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 3,110,756 | 8,548,473 |
| Cores / threads | 16 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Core Ultra 9 285H · All measurements for Genuine 0000 @ 3.40GHz