Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 5 9600X
Short answer: which is best?
Core Ultra 9 285H is 0.3 % stronger than Ryzen 5 9600X. Core Ultra 9 285H ranks #12 of 56 measured processors at WhatFPS (11,033 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Ryzen 5 9600X ranks #13 of 56 measured processors at WhatFPS (11,003 CPU score over 2 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Core Ultra 9 285H | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 11,033 | 11,003 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 3,354 | 8,806 |
| Integer (MT) | 6.3 Gop/s | 6.7 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.89 Gop/s | 0.88 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 3,110,756 | 10,063,326 |
| Cores / threads | 16 / 16 | 6 / 12 |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 32 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Core Ultra 9 285H · All measurements for Ryzen 5 9600X