Core Ultra X7 358H vs Core i9-10900F
Short answer: which is best?
Core Ultra X7 358H is 13.4 % stronger than Core i9-10900F. Core Ultra X7 358H ranks #13 of 53 measured processors at WhatFPS (10,578 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Core i9-10900F ranks #19 of 53 measured processors at WhatFPS (9,329 CPU score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Core Ultra X7 358H | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 10,578 | 9,329 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 4,693 | 7,406 |
| Integer (MT) | 6.4 Gop/s | 8.4 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.78 Gop/s | 0.55 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 3,294,083 | 4,374,625 |
| Cores / threads | 16 / 16 | 10 / 20 |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 20 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Core Ultra X7 358H · All measurements for Core i9-10900F