Acer Predator GM7 4 TB vs SAMSUNG MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Acer Predator GM7 4 TB is 320.8 % stronger than SAMSUNG MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128 GB. Acer Predator GM7 4 TB ranks #5 of 105 measured system drives at WhatFPS (15,709 Drive score over 2 verified runs). SAMSUNG MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128 GB ranks #91 of 105 measured system drives at WhatFPS (3,733 Drive score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Acer Predator GM7 4 TB | SAMSUNG MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 15,709 | 3,733 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 13,665 | 7,216 |
| Sequential read | 4,709 MB/s | 533 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 18,395 | 9,177 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 49 µs | 104 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 4 TB | 128 GB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Acer Predator GM7 4 TB · All measurements for SAMSUNG MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128 GB