Crucial P310 4 TB vs Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 512 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Crucial P310 4 TB is 68 % stronger than Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 512 GB. Crucial P310 4 TB ranks #6 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (14,351 Drive score over 3 verified runs). Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 512 GB ranks #28 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (8,543 Drive score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 4 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Crucial P310 4 TB | Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 512 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 14,351 | 8,543 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 17,066 | 12,713 |
| Sequential read | 3,818 MB/s | 2,462 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 18,297 | 10,404 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 53 µs | 88 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 4 TB | 512 GB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Crucial P310 4 TB · All measurements for Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 512 GB