Kingston NV2 500 GB vs GoodRAM CX400 256 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Kingston NV2 500 GB is 193.5 % stronger than GoodRAM CX400 256 GB. Kingston NV2 500 GB ranks #31 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (8,158 Drive score over 14 verified runs). GoodRAM CX400 256 GB ranks #54 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (2,780 Drive score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 15 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Kingston NV2 500 GB | GoodRAM CX400 256 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 8,158 | 2,780 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 7,350 | 2,861 |
| Sequential read | 1,986 MB/s | 441 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 11,823 | 6,152 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 80 µs | 150 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | SATA SSD |
| Size | 500 GB | 256 GB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Kingston NV2 500 GB · All measurements for GoodRAM CX400 256 GB