Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB vs HS-SSD-E2000 512G 512 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB is 57.6 % stronger than HS-SSD-E2000 512G 512 GB. Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB ranks #3 of 102 measured system drives at WhatFPS (17,026 Drive score over 1 verified runs). HS-SSD-E2000 512G 512 GB ranks #38 of 102 measured system drives at WhatFPS (10,800 Drive score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB | HS-SSD-E2000 512G 512 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 17,026 | 10,800 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 11,994 | 7,023 |
| Sequential read | 5,368 MB/s | 2,739 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 18,955 | 14,948 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 52 µs | 61 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 1 TB | 512 GB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB · All measurements for HS-SSD-E2000 512G 512 GB