Lexar NM990 4 TB vs GIGABYTE AG450E1024-SI 1 TB
Short answer: which is best?
Lexar NM990 4 TB is 34.7 % stronger than GIGABYTE AG450E1024-SI 1 TB. Lexar NM990 4 TB ranks #4 of 118 measured system drives at WhatFPS (15,889 Drive score over 1 verified runs). GIGABYTE AG450E1024-SI 1 TB ranks #33 of 118 measured system drives at WhatFPS (11,795 Drive score over 2 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Lexar NM990 4 TB | GIGABYTE AG450E1024-SI 1 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 15,889 | 11,795 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 8,962 | 5,235 |
| Sequential read | 4,971 MB/s | 2,767 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 17,827 | 17,647 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 51 µs | 50 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 4 TB | 1 TB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Lexar NM990 4 TB · All measurements for GIGABYTE AG450E1024-SI 1 TB