Lexar NM990 4 TB vs XG7000-1TB 2280
Short answer: which is best?
Lexar NM990 4 TB is 45.3 % stronger than XG7000-1TB 2280. Lexar NM990 4 TB ranks #4 of 101 measured system drives at WhatFPS (15,889 Drive score over 1 verified runs). XG7000-1TB 2280 ranks #34 of 101 measured system drives at WhatFPS (10,934 Drive score over 2 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Lexar NM990 4 TB | XG7000-1TB 2280 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 15,889 | 10,934 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 8,962 | 4,390 |
| Sequential read | 4,971 MB/s | 2,581 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 17,827 | 16,257 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 51 µs | 58 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 4 TB | 1 TB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Lexar NM990 4 TB · All measurements for XG7000-1TB 2280