Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB vs Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 1 TB
Short answer: which is best?
Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB is 23.9 % stronger than Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 1 TB. Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB ranks #22 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (9,919 Drive score over 2 verified runs). Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 1 TB ranks #33 of 54 measured system drives at WhatFPS (8,007 Drive score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB | Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 1 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 9,919 | 8,007 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 10,855 | 3,675 |
| Sequential read | 2,396 MB/s | 2,130 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 14,426 | 10,564 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 64 µs | 89 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 1 TB | 1 TB |
What the numbers mean
The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB · All measurements for Kioxia XG6 (OEM) 1 TB