Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB vs 0x108F ED4AGSA80-32N220E 1×16 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB is 593.4 % stronger than 0x108F ED4AGSA80-32N220E 1×16 GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB ranks #1 of 115 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (13,314 RAM score over 8 verified runs). 0x108F ED4AGSA80-32N220E 1×16 GB ranks #115 of 115 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (1,920 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 9 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB | 0x108F ED4AGSA80-32N220E 1×16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 13,314 | 1,920 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 14,156 | 2,776 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 49,321 MB/s | 5,959 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 74.1 ns | 430.2 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 16 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB · All measurements for 0x108F ED4AGSA80-32N220E 1×16 GB