Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB vs Crucial DDR5-4800 CL40 2×32 GB SO-DIMM
Short answer: which is best?
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB is 78.7 % stronger than Crucial DDR5-4800 CL40 2×32 GB SO-DIMM. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB ranks #1 of 124 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (13,588 RAM score in its best run — 1 rig, 19 verified runs). Crucial DDR5-4800 CL40 2×32 GB SO-DIMM ranks #76 of 124 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (7,604 RAM score in its best run — 1 rig, 1 verified run). Each part is shown at its best run, picked from 20 verified WhatFPS runs — measured, not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB | Crucial DDR5-4800 CL40 2×32 GB SO-DIMM |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score, best run (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 13,588 | 7,604 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 14,797 | 6,652 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 49,462 MB/s | 24,496 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 71.3 ns | 112.7 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s |
| Runs at (best run) | 6,000 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB |
What the numbers mean
The headline score is the part's best measured run, and the measurements under it come from that same run. It shows what the part has been proven to do — not what an average rig gets out of it. The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB · All measurements for Crucial DDR5-4800 CL40 2×32 GB SO-DIMM