Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1×8 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB is 110.1 % stronger than Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1×8 GB. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB ranks #4 of 49 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (11,605 RAM score over 6 verified runs). Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1×8 GB ranks #43 of 49 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (5,524 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 7 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB | Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1×8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 11,605 | 5,524 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 21,848 | 2,211 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 43,977 MB/s | 10,126 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 86.9 ns | 88.3 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 8 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 2×16 GB · All measurements for Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 1×8 GB