Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB vs Micron MTC8C1084S1VC64BD1 K 2×16 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB is 52.8 % stronger than Micron MTC8C1084S1VC64BD1 K 2×16 GB. Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB ranks #8 of 77 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (11,938 RAM score over 2 verified runs). Micron MTC8C1084S1VC64BD1 K 2×16 GB ranks #45 of 77 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (7,812 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB | Micron MTC8C1084S1VC64BD1 K 2×16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 11,938 | 7,812 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 10,117 | 10,167 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 44,079 MB/s | 29,655 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 82.6 ns | 129.3 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB · All measurements for Micron MTC8C1084S1VC64BD1 K 2×16 GB