Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB vs WPBS48D508SWB-16G 1×16 GB
Short answer: which is best?
Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB is 100.1 % stronger than WPBS48D508SWB-16G 1×16 GB. Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB ranks #5 of 60 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (12,554 RAM score over 1 verified runs). WPBS48D508SWB-16G 1×16 GB ranks #47 of 60 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (6,275 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB | WPBS48D508SWB-16G 1×16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 12,554 | 6,275 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 6,971 | 3,771 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 45,772 MB/s | 16,690 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 77.3 ns | 112.8 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 16 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Crucial Pro DDR4-6000 CL36 2×16 GB · All measurements for WPBS48D508SWB-16G 1×16 GB