G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL26 2×16 GB vs TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 4×8 GB
Short answer: which is best?
G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL26 2×16 GB is 36.2 % stronger than TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 4×8 GB. G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL26 2×16 GB ranks #5 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (11,048 RAM score over 1 verified runs). TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 4×8 GB ranks #21 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (8,109 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL26 2×16 GB | TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 4×8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 11,048 | 8,109 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 11,289 | 6,073 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 40,969 MB/s | 23,448 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 89.3 ns | 94.9 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 4,800 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL26 2×16 GB · All measurements for TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 4×8 GB