G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL36 2×16 GB vs G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-4400 CL19 2×16 GB
Short answer: which is best?
G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL36 2×16 GB is 19.8 % stronger than G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-4400 CL19 2×16 GB. G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL36 2×16 GB ranks #5 of 81 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (12,404 RAM score over 2 verified runs). G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-4400 CL19 2×16 GB ranks #14 of 81 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (10,352 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL36 2×16 GB | G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-4400 CL19 2×16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 12,404 | 10,352 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 9,934 | 822 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 46,600 MB/s | 31,581 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 80.6 ns | 78.4 ns |
| Rated speed | 6,000 MT/s | 4,400 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 4,400 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL36 2×16 GB · All measurements for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-4400 CL19 2×16 GB