Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2×8 GB vs Crucial DDR5-5600 CL46 2×24 GB SO-DIMM
Short answer: which is best?
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2×8 GB is 93.7 % stronger than Crucial DDR5-5600 CL46 2×24 GB SO-DIMM. Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2×8 GB ranks #24 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (7,843 RAM score over 1 verified runs). Crucial DDR5-5600 CL46 2×24 GB SO-DIMM ranks #41 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (4,049 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2×8 GB | Crucial DDR5-5600 CL46 2×24 GB SO-DIMM |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 7,843 | 4,049 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 4,283 | 5,007 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 19,145 MB/s | 14,105 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 82.8 ns | 228.9 ns |
| Rated speed | 3,200 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 2,933 MT/s | 5,600 MT/s |
| Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2×8 GB · All measurements for Crucial DDR5-5600 CL46 2×24 GB SO-DIMM