UD5-6000 2×16 GB vs SK hynix fastlött DDR4-3200 2×16 GB SO-DIMM
Short answer: which is best?
UD5-6000 2×16 GB is 69.4 % stronger than SK hynix fastlött DDR4-3200 2×16 GB SO-DIMM. UD5-6000 2×16 GB ranks #7 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (10,241 RAM score over 1 verified runs). SK hynix fastlött DDR4-3200 2×16 GB SO-DIMM ranks #34 of 42 measured memory kits at WhatFPS (6,044 RAM score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | UD5-6000 2×16 GB | SK hynix fastlött DDR4-3200 2×16 GB SO-DIMM |
|---|---|---|
| RAM score (the kit's own performance: bandwidth + latency) | 10,241 | 6,044 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 10,438 | 3,675 |
| Bandwidth, one thread | 35,109 MB/s | 16,136 MB/s |
| RAM latency (lower is better) | 89.1 ns | 117.5 ns |
| Rated speed | 4,800 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Runs at (seen, avg) | 6,000 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
What the numbers mean
The RAM score is the kit's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — single-thread bandwidth and latency beyond L3. Platform, BIOS settings and whether XMP/EXPO was on all affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for UD5-6000 2×16 GB · All measurements for SK hynix fastlött DDR4-3200 2×16 GB SO-DIMM