HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB
Measured performance for HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB across 1 verified WhatFPS runs. Every number is measured in our benchmark suite — not estimated, not self-reported. Drive score (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS): 12,763 — measured in one rig so far, #29 of 130 measured system drives. Most often paired with AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with Radeon Graphics.
The measurements below come from the same run as the headline score. View the run
HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB — subtests
- Sequential read (1 MB blocks): 3,677 MB/s
- 4K IOPS: 15,549
- 4K latency, median: 58 µs — lower is better
- 4K latency, p99: 172 µs
Specifications
- Manufacturer: unknown — shown as reported
- Type: NVMe SSD
- Size: 512 GB
- Model string (seen): HFS512GEM9X174N
What the numbers mean
The headline score is the part's best measured run, and the measurements under it come from that same run. It shows what the part has been proven to do — not what an average rig gets out of it. The GAMING score is a geometric mean of GPU (63 %), CPU (30 %), RAM (5 %) and drive (2 %) — a weak part cannot hide behind a strong one. The drive score is a geometric mean of sequential read (1 MB blocks) and random 4K read (IOPS), measured unbuffered on a 256 MB temp file on the system drive. Only the system drive is measured. The same model can differ between rigs: PCIe generation, fill level and driver all matter. Every run is HMAC-signed in the app and scored on the server. The full methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
Compare HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB with other hardware
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 2 TB — 19,442 Drive score
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs Samsung 9100 PRO 1 TB — 18,621 Drive score
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs Kioxia XG10 (OEM) 1 TB — 17,026 Drive score
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs Lexar NM790 1 TB — 16,958 Drive score
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs WD Green SN3000 500 GB — 16,530 Drive score
- HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB vs Samsung 990 PRO 1 TB — 16,069 Drive score