WD Green SN3000 500 GB vs HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB
Short answer: which is best?
WD Green SN3000 500 GB is 29.5 % stronger than HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB. WD Green SN3000 500 GB ranks #5 of 130 measured system drives at WhatFPS (16,530 Drive score in its best run — best of 2 rigs, 3 verified runs). HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB ranks #29 of 130 measured system drives at WhatFPS (12,763 Drive score in its best run — 1 rig, 1 verified run). Each part is shown at its best run, picked from 4 verified WhatFPS runs — measured, not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | WD Green SN3000 500 GB | HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Drive score, best run (the drive's own performance: sequential read + 4K IOPS) | 16,530 | 12,763 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 9,178 | 6,953 |
| Sequential read | 4,129 MB/s | 3,677 MB/s |
| 4K IOPS | 23,227 | 15,549 |
| 4K latency, median (lower is better) | 38 µs | 58 µs |
| Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Size | 500 GB | 512 GB |
What the numbers mean
The headline score is the part's best measured run, and the measurements under it come from that same run. It shows what the part has been proven to do — not what an average rig gets out of it. The drive score is the system drive's measured performance in the rigs it sat in — sequential read and 4K IOPS, unbuffered. PCIe generation, fill level and driver affect it. GAMING is the whole rig's score. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite, the same test on every PC, written in Rust with no middleware. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for WD Green SN3000 500 GB · All measurements for HFS512GEM9X174N 512 GB