Core i9-10900F vs Core Ultra 5 125H
Short answer: which is best?
Core i9-10900F is 19.2 % stronger than Core Ultra 5 125H. Core i9-10900F ranks #21 of 59 measured processors at WhatFPS (9,329 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Core Ultra 5 125H ranks #34 of 59 measured processors at WhatFPS (7,825 CPU score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Core i9-10900F | Core Ultra 5 125H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 9,329 | 7,825 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 7,406 | 2,533 |
| Integer (MT) | 8.4 Gop/s | 6 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.55 Gop/s | 0.62 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 4,374,625 | 2,090,563 |
| Cores / threads | 10 / 20 | 14 / 18 |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 18 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Core i9-10900F · All measurements for Core Ultra 5 125H