Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core i3-9100F
Short answer: which is best?
Core Ultra 9 275HX is 287.5 % stronger than Core i3-9100F. Core Ultra 9 275HX ranks #4 of 72 measured processors at WhatFPS (15,096 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Core i3-9100F ranks #68 of 72 measured processors at WhatFPS (3,896 CPU score over 2 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 3 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 15,096 | 3,896 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 10,167 | 2,890 |
| Integer (MT) | 13.9 Gop/s | 1.5 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.9 Gop/s | 0.43 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 12,109,559 | 6,334,804 |
| Cores / threads | 24 / 24 | 4 / 4 |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 6 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Core Ultra 9 275HX · All measurements for Core i3-9100F