Ryzen 5 9600X vs Core i9-10900F
Short answer: which is best?
Ryzen 5 9600X is 19 % stronger than Core i9-10900F. Ryzen 5 9600X ranks #12 of 56 measured processors at WhatFPS (11,104 CPU score over 1 verified runs). Core i9-10900F ranks #21 of 56 measured processors at WhatFPS (9,329 CPU score over 1 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 2 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | Ryzen 5 9600X | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU score (the processor's own performance) | 11,104 | 9,329 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 8,806 | 7,406 |
| Integer (MT) | 6.8 Gop/s | 8.4 Gop/s |
| Single-thread (1T) | 0.89 Gop/s | 0.55 Gop/s |
| Draw calls/s (DX11) | 4,660,528 | 4,374,625 |
| Cores / threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20 |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 20 MB |
What the numbers mean
The CPU score is the processor's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the processor in, and leans heavily on the graphics card. A strong processor in a weak PC gets a low GAMING score without being worse. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for Ryzen 5 9600X · All measurements for Core i9-10900F