GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics
Short answer: which is best?
GTX 1650 is 214.6 % stronger than Iris Xe Graphics. GTX 1650 ranks #54 of 61 measured graphics cards at WhatFPS (994 GPU score over 1 verified runs). Iris Xe Graphics ranks #60 of 61 measured graphics cards at WhatFPS (316 GPU score over 6 verified runs). The numbers are measured in 7 verified WhatFPS runs — not estimated, not self-reported.
Measured comparison
| Metric | GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| GPU score (the card's own performance) | 994 | 316 |
| Best rig (GAMING — whole PC) | 2,200 | 881 |
| Earth II (Vulkan) | 6 FPS | 1.4 FPS |
| Mission to Earth II (DX12) | 7 FPS | 3.1 FPS |
| Earth II Landing (DX12 Ultimate) | 10.6 FPS | 2.3 FPS |
| Supernova (DX11) | 62.8 FPS | 10.7 FPS |
| Memory bandwidth | 37 GB/s | 7 GB/s |
| VRAM | 4 GB | — |
| Ray tracing | Not supported | Not supported |
What the numbers mean
The GPU score is the graphics card's own performance — that is what we rank on. GAMING is the whole rig's score in the best PC we measured the card in, and depends on processor, memory and storage. We show both and never mix them.
All numbers come from our benchmark suite: four hand-built 3D scenes written directly against the graphics APIs in Rust, the same load on every PC. The methodology is open at https://whatfps.com/metodik
All measurements for GTX 1650 · All measurements for Iris Xe Graphics